Monday, August 18, 2008

Romeo and Juliet

This production got weak reviews early in the season and has suffered weak audiences as a result. But an early August performance was excellent and showed the value of waiting until later in the run when the cast has a chance to develop the performance.

Romeo and Juliet were young and enthusisatic and silly teenagers - what you need to make the tragedy real.

The only jarring note was the odd change of costume, from modern to Elilzabethan and then back again at the end. I assume it was to underscore the ageless nature of the story, but it was annoying and unnecessary. Pick a period (either one would have been fine) and stick with it!

1 comment:

  1. The costume change is the sort of thing directors do when they don't have any real ideas. You got over it, but it was unnecessary and unhelpful. I don't know what McAnuff was thinking, as the rest of the direction was excellent.
    The young lovers were very right for the roles, this Juliet was a believable 14 year-old, despite the actresses real age. I look forward to seeing Nikki James in Caesar & Cleopatra!
    Friar Lawrence and the nurse seemed a lot more real than the cardboard cutouts they often become; kudos to Peter Donaldson and Lucy Peacock.
    I don't know what the critics were being snotty about.

    ReplyDelete